AI-assisted workflow
Review AI-assisted intake
Turn incoming litigation documents into proposed facts and links without surrendering attorney review.
AI-assisted intake helps structure a large document set, but it never writes directly into the proof graph. Every extracted item enters a review queue first.
The review sequence
- Add the documents you want to analyze.
- Wait for extraction to finish and inspect any document-level warnings.
- Review each proposed fact in context.
- Edit wording, reject noise, or approve the proposal.
- Confirm suggested links to claims and elements.
What to check
- Attribution: Does the source actually say this, and who said it?
- Precision: Is the proposal a fact rather than an argument or conclusion?
- Date and sequence: Has the system preserved temporal context?
- Support: Is the cited passage the right anchor for the fact?
- Privilege and sensitivity: Should this material enter the matter workspace at all?
Keep human review meaningful
Batch approval is tempting, but it defeats the reason the queue exists. Review uncertain and high-impact proposals first, then use consistent decisions to move through the remainder efficiently.