AI-assisted workflow

Review AI-assisted intake

Turn incoming litigation documents into proposed facts and links without surrendering attorney review.

AI-assisted intake helps structure a large document set, but it never writes directly into the proof graph. Every extracted item enters a review queue first.

The review sequence

  1. Add the documents you want to analyze.
  2. Wait for extraction to finish and inspect any document-level warnings.
  3. Review each proposed fact in context.
  4. Edit wording, reject noise, or approve the proposal.
  5. Confirm suggested links to claims and elements.

What to check

  • Attribution: Does the source actually say this, and who said it?
  • Precision: Is the proposal a fact rather than an argument or conclusion?
  • Date and sequence: Has the system preserved temporal context?
  • Support: Is the cited passage the right anchor for the fact?
  • Privilege and sensitivity: Should this material enter the matter workspace at all?

Keep human review meaningful

Batch approval is tempting, but it defeats the reason the queue exists. Review uncertain and high-impact proposals first, then use consistent decisions to move through the remainder efficiently.